Solution · AI assistants & control testing
13

Your assistant runs the test. Your reviewer decides.

Connect the AI assistant your team already uses to Zovos over MCP. It works under each person’s own role, runs control tests against your systems with your credentials, and submits the evidence for a different person to accept.

ForCybersecurity · Compliance · Enterprise & operational risk
SurfacesMCP server · Zovos Evidence Protocol · Controls · Findings · Audit log
The shape of the problem · 01

What this actually feels like.

  • 01Control testing means screenshots pasted into a workpaper, one system at a time.
  • 02Your team already works with an AI assistant, but it cannot see the compliance record.
  • 03Evidence arrives without a record of who ran the test or which tool produced it.
  • 04Handing a vendor tool your system credentials creates one more risk to manage.
How Zovos handles it · 02

Five steps, one graph.

Every step writes back to the same controls, policies, and issues your team already owns. There is no second source of truth.

  1. 01
    Connect
    Your owner turns on the MCP server in Settings. Each person signs in from their own assistant and works under their own Zovos role.
  2. 02
    Fetch
    The assistant reads the control and its published procedure, including the evidence the procedure expects.
  3. 03
    Test
    The assistant runs the procedure against your own systems with your own credentials. Zovos never receives them.
  4. 04
    Submit
    The raw evidence and the result go to Zovos. The server checks the evidence hash and scans the file before anything is stored.
  5. 05
    Review
    A different person accepts or rejects the result. A failed test opens a draft finding, and accepted results export as OSCAL or OCSF.
What changes · 03

What the product does instead.

Tools
The MCP server registers 36 tools, and every write shows a dry run first.
Skill packs
Skill packs cover 17 control families for Claude, Copilot, and Cursor.
Review
A different person must accept a result before any rating changes.
Audit
Every tool call writes its own row to the audit log.
Related scenarios · 04

If this is your Friday, these are too.

10

Compliance monitoring & testing

Sample by risk, record results in a sample-by-step matrix, capture exceptions with root cause, and let a governed sign-off promote a failed test straight into a finding.

Read the scenario→
07

Control mapping (FFIEC, NIST, ISO)

One control library is crosswalked across 54 frameworks, with 754 indexed citations tracing each rule to the control that satisfies it.

Read the scenario→

Want to see this on your library?

Bring a control library, a policy, and one regulator paragraph that gives you trouble. We target two-week onboarding.

Talk to the team →All solutions