CompareZovos vs Drata

Zovos vs Drata

Drata calls itself the agentic trust management platform. It automates security compliance, manages internal and third-party risk, and serves more than 8,500 customers across industries. Zovos is built only for financial institutions, with regulatory change, exams, findings and internal audit in the same system as third-party risk.
Zovos
Agentic GRC for financial institutions
Built for
Financial institutions of every size
AI
15 agent task types on Claude via AWS Bedrock, each one human-gated
Content
57 frameworks and 2,339 indexed citations
Pricing
Published, from $75k a year with every module included
Drata
Agentic trust management
Built for
Companies of every industry
AI
Agentic TPRM and questionnaire response, with human control
Content
Security frameworks. FFIEC is requirements only
Pricing
Quote only, in three compliance tiers
Where it differs

Trust management, or the regulator’s view.

01

Bank frameworks

With Drata

Drata lists FFIEC as requirements only, without pre-mapped controls, and its frameworks page does not list GLBA.

In Zovos

Zovos ships 57 frameworks and 2,339 indexed citations, each cited to the rule paragraph.

02

Exams and findings

With Drata

Drata’s Audit Hub serves security audits with read-only auditor access. We found no exam or MRA tracking.

In Zovos

Examiners get scoped, time-boxed access, and no finding or MRA closes without remediation evidence and a second approver.

03

Regulatory change

With Drata

We found no feed that tracks new rules and amendments from regulators.

In Zovos

An agent reads the Federal Register and eCFR, and every citation is versioned by amendment date.

1 of 3
Side by side

Line by line, in plain words.

What each product offers a financial institution's governance, risk and compliance program, from public sources read October 30, 2026.

Zovos compared with Drata
CapabilityZovosDrata
Built forBuilt in

Financial institutions of every size, and no other market.

Partial

Companies in many industries. The homepage does not mention financial services.

Regulatory changeBuilt in

An agent reads Federal Register and eCFR primary sources, and every citation is versioned by amendment date.

Not published

No regulatory change feed is described on its site.

AI agentsBuilt in

15 agent task types run on Anthropic Claude through AWS Bedrock, and every output stays a proposal until a person accepts it.

Built in

Agentic TPRM assessment is generally available and agentic questionnaire response is in beta, with users in control of critical actions. The model provider is not named.

Your own AI assistantBuilt in

Claude, Copilot, ChatGPT or any other MCP client works inside Zovos under the user’s own role, once the tenant owner turns it on.

Partial

An experimental MCP server for Claude and AI coding tools, announced in June 2025.

Exams and examinersBuilt in

Examiners get scoped, time-boxed grants that are read-only apart from a closed set of fieldwork actions.

Partial

Audit Hub and an auditor portal for security audits. No regulatory exam management is described.

Findings and MRAsBuilt in

No finding closes without remediation evidence, and every closure is maker-checker.

Not published

No MRA or exam finding tracking is described.

Internal auditBuilt in

Auditees see only their own requests, and auditors cannot approve what they may audit.

Partial

Internal audits of the security program are supported.

Third-party riskBuilt in

Third-party risk management is included at every tier, with SIG and CAIQ workbook import.

Built in

Agentic third-party risk management, also sold on its own, priced per full review.

PricingPublished

Starting prices are published by asset size, from $75k a year, with every module and the AI agents included.

Quote only

Foundation, Advanced and Enterprise compliance tiers, with no prices shown.

SSO and SCIMBuilt in

SAML 2.0, OIDC and SCIM come with every tier at no enterprise upcharge.

Higher tiers

SSO is in every compliance tier. SCIM for the Trust Center is in Advanced and Enterprise only.

Fair to say

Pick the one that fits your program.

Where Drata is strong
  • Deep continuous control monitoring with a broad set of integrations.
  • Agentic third-party risk reviews with evidence-backed reasoning and usage-based pricing.
  • Early support for governing the AI agents a company runs.
Zovos, in numbers
57
Regulatory frameworks
2,339
Indexed citations
15
Human-gated agent task types
Choose Drata if

You need SOC 2, ISO 27001 or a trust center for a technology business, or a standalone vendor review service.

Choose Zovos if

You need the regulatory side of a financial institution’s program, from rule changes to exam findings, in one system.

Sources

Where this comes from.

Every Drata cell on this page comes from these public pages, read October 30, 2026. Zovos cells describe shipped product behaviour.

  1. Drata homepage, product positioning. drata.com
  2. Drata pricing and tiers. drata.com
  3. Drata help center, supported frameworks. help.drata.com
  4. Drata agentic capabilities announcement, March 2026. drata.com
  5. Drata agentic third-party risk announcement, September 2026. drata.com
  6. Drata MCP server announcement. drata.com

See it with your own program. Then decide.

Bring your controls, a policy, and one regulator paragraph that gives you trouble. We target two-week onboarding.